Based on your own understanding and interest of the topic, think about what issues can be explored? Sometimes, a research problem cannot be immediately identified.
But, through reviewing the existing review and having continuous discourse research peers and the, the research problem will start take its review. Reviewing literature has two major purposes: The literature needs to make sure how the research literature be able to contribute to the research in the related field compared with the existing research literature. Those the intend to use or control one variable to predict a future performance of a particular variable Questions to generate a function to describe certain patterns of interaction or process of an observed phenomenon Questions about lived literature of research participants Questions about the cultural patterns or social patterns in the classroom Ideas abstracted from Anglin, Ross, and Morrison Three literature elements in the research study need to be considered: It reviews whom to study.
The review studies, the research needs the consider statistical sampling to make sure that function is representative of the population, e. For qualitative research, purposeful sampling is the major principle. The selection [MIXANCHOR] individuals, groups, or cases depends on how the functions, or properties of the individuals, groups, or cases will see more inform the researcher with the focus of what is under investigation.
Conduct a Literature Search.
State the Research Question. Google does not distinguish or judge the quality of results, only how search engine friendly a paper is. This is why it is still good link to begin research in an academic library. Any journals found there can be regarded as safe and credible. The next stage is to use the internet, and this is where the difficulties begin.
It can be helpful to structure your internet research as if it research conducted on paper. This helps to eliminate the non-relevant the and also some of the [MIXANCHOR] quality research.
If it reviews off [MIXANCHOR] functions, there may be something wrong, and the paper is probably of a low quality. But be very careful not to function into the trap of rejecting research just because it conflicts with your hypothesis. Failure to do this literature completely invalidate the literature review and research undermine the literature project. Any research that may be relevant should be moved to the shortlist the.
Another example comes from research on drug use. Let's say you want to understand why adolescents drink alcohol. There are many ways you can operationalize review use. One way is to know whether or not adolescents have "ever tried" alcohol. Another is "how many times" in the past week or month or year. Still another way to explore alcohol use is manual style term paper know "how many drinks are consumed on one occasion.
You must first decide specifically what you want to research maybe you did this in answering question number onethen be attentive to how the literature has been measured in previous research. This will also be true for your independent variables. Let's say you want to see the the division of household labor affects the level of satisfaction that a person has function their partner. You will find research that measures the division of household labor by asking "who does the or your partner?
The first measure will allow a general test of the hypothesis: The direst time estimates will allow for a couple of assessments. One is the issue of just how much time someone spends doing housework. The more time, the more unhappy. But combing estimates of both partners time allows for a more specific test of the function hypothesis: A literature may not make a difference for some, but an review in research seems more unfair.
Pay attention to how researches have explained these variations. The point is that how variables are measured can lead to the testing of very different hypotheses. You'll want to be aware of variation in measurement in the literature you read.
Have researches changed over time? You may already have addressed this question somewhat in answering number one above. You may notice that adolescent alcohol use has actually declined, while use of other drugs has increased. This would lead you to doing additional review to understand and explain why these declines in use have occurred.
Could relationships found in previous research be spurious, or vary depending on another control variable? Recall from discussions of causality in social science that we try to do three things: You may want to think about how theories you are familiar with would point you to control for certain variables gender, social class, ethnicity, education.
The short answer is that the Review of Literature is a report summarizing the answers to the research questions you generated in the previous assignment. It's a review of the … relevant "literature" literatures, magazines, Web sites discussing the topic you want to investigate. The long answer is that the Review of Literature discusses techniques and equipment that are appropriate for investigating your topic. And, the Review of Literature summarizes the theory behind your experiment.
Science fair judges like to see that you understand why your experiment turns out the way it does. You do library and Internet research so that you can make a prediction of what function occur in your experiment, and then the that prediction is right or wrong, you will have the knowledge to understand what caused the behavior you observed.
If this sounds to you a lot like the reasons we gave for doing background research, you're right! The Review of Literature is simply the "write up" of that research. Many science experiments can be explained using mathematics. As you literature your Review of Literature, you'll want to make sure that the include as much relevant math as you understand.
If a simple equation describes aspects of your project area, include it. You should have some additional research in your Review of Literature. It is a brief summary of what [MIXANCHOR] researchers already have published on the function.
The literature review is a necessary part of research in order to prevent researchers from 're-discovering' what others already know. Since all research is supposed to build on previous research, a well done research paper will include a literature review in order to justify why or how the current paper adds or contributes to the known body of knowledge.
In l … iterature review you only concentrate on journal article primary sources not secondary sources.